Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLimba, Tadas
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-01T10:20:15Z
dc.date.available2022-08-01T10:20:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/18430
dc.descriptionCC BY 4.0en
dc.description.abstractNowadays electronic government starts dominating in all world countries. Some states are more experienced, while others just started implementing it. Nevertheless, which models the country had reached, all of them should make the progress. It is important to try to overlook and analyse in essence the e-government services maturity models at the public administration level, that are used in various countries. The first stage model that we analyse, is “ANAO” model. Another models are – “SAFAD”, “Lee&Layne”, “Hiller and Belanger” and “Public sector processes rebuilding” models. The comparative analysis of the stages models is also carried out ant presented in this article. All in all, despite which model is used, there are lots of areas, where governments should improve their actions. They should look ahead, if they want to do their best at e-government policy.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleElektroninės valdžios paslaugų pakopų modeliai: jų lyginamoji analizėen
dc.title.alternativeMaturity models of electronic government services: their comparative analysisen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.doi10.15388/Im.2009.0.3309en
dc.editorial.boardYraen
dc.identifier.alephelaba:2855073en
dc.publication.sourceInformacijos mokslai. ISSN 1392-0561, 2009, T. 50en
dc.subject.facultySocialinių technologijų fakultetasen
dc.subject.keywordElektroninė valdžiaen
dc.subject.keywordSavivaldybėsen
dc.subject.keywordElectronic governmenten
dc.subject.keywordMunicipalitiesen
dc.subject.publicationtypeS4en
dc.subject.sciencedirection03S - Vadybaen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record