Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAakhus, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMačiulienė, Monika
dc.contributor.authorPaglieri, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorRoginsky, Sandrine
dc.contributor.authorTorroni, Paolo
dc.contributor.authorVillata, Serena
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-12T11:06:10Z
dc.date.available2020-05-12T11:06:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/16464
dc.description.abstractThis report reflects in its structure the basic rationale of WG3 approach: it starts by listing some key challenges and prospects for argumentation in public debate, to set the background against which resources and methods for designing public argumentation need to be tested; the rest of the report provides brief but comprehensive reviews of the three key elements required to tackle such challenges – a critical understanding on the notion of “stakeholders”, in-depth mastery of the most promising technologies aimed at supporting public argumentation, with an emphasis on open issues and critical vulnerabilities, and a design perspective on argumentation. The last section summarizes the main findings of this preliminary survey.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleBasic Resources and Methods for Designing Public Argumentationen
dc.typeBooken
dc.editorial.boardNetaikomaen
dc.identifier.alephelaba:57905591en
dc.subject.facultyKitasen
dc.subject.keywordPublic policy argumentationen
dc.subject.keywordCo-creationen
dc.subject.keywordArgumentation technologiesen
dc.subject.laboratorySocialinių technologijų laboratorijaen
dc.subject.publicationtypeK4cen
dc.subject.sciencedirection08S - Komunikacija ir informacijaen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record