Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHussar, Ave
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-28T09:22:41Z
dc.date.available2018-12-28T09:22:41Z
dc.identifier.issn2351-6674
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/15504
dc.description.abstractA certain degree of “default” flexibility in residential lease relations is important in guaranteeing the tenant’s right to free movement and facilitating mobility in the labour market; in other words, the tenant should enjoy a right to terminate the tenancy relationship without extensive adverse consequences. With this in mind, I will first elaborate the comparative analysis on the tenant’s right to terminate. Next, I will argue that tenants in Estonia have no real choice to opt for the flexibility needed without a trade-off in terms of stability, and why asymmetry of the parties’ right to terminate is recommendable. Finally, I propose considering Europe-wide best practices and the local socioeconomic environment, with draft amendments to Estonian tenancy law in order to meet needs.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVilnius: Mykolas Romeris University, 2018en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleFlexibility of Residential Lease Relations from the Tenant’s Perspective: Estonian Law in a Comparative Contexten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.doi10.13165/j.icj.2018.12.006en
dc.editorial.boardYraen
dc.publication.sourceInternational comparative jurisprudence. ISSN 2351-6674, 2018, Vol. 4, No 2en
dc.subject.facultyKitasen
dc.subject.keywordFreedom of movementen
dc.subject.keywordComparative contract lawen
dc.subject.keywordTenancy lawen
dc.subject.publicationtypeS4en
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record