Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJakštienė, Ramunė
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-31T08:19:56Z
dc.date.available2018-10-31T08:19:56Z
dc.identifier.issn1392–6195
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/15275
dc.description.abstractThis paper discusses the concept of a family member in criminal cases of violence in a close environment. The main objective of the analysis was to determine the scope of this concept as applied in national case law, while determining the qualifying element of a crime against human life and health (Chapters XVII and XVIII of the Penal Code). The subject-matter of the research was limited to the most problematic aspects as follows: 1) de facto partnership; 2) spouses; 3) former close relationship; 4) and some other relationship. Sixty decisions of national courts were used for the analysis to determine whether consistent case law for interpreting the concept of a family member ad hoc is adequate for the effective application of this concept, and whether adjustments pertaining to its legal regulation are also necessary. The results of the research lead to the conclusion that interpretation of the concept by making references to Art. 248.2 of the Penal Code (Chapter XXXIV), or Art. 38 of the Criminal Procedure Code, or definitions provided in the Civil Code or special Law on Protection Against Violence in a Close Environment is not consistent with the principle nullum crimen sine lege stricta. Therefore, in order to ensure the appropriate protection of victims of crime and adequate qualification of crimes, it is necessary to include the definition of the family member in Chapters XVII and XVIII of the Penal Code. In the case of actual partnership and spouses living separately, the Lithuanian courts essentially adequately interpret the concept of the family, applying it consistently to both de facto and de jure relations. However, according to the provisions of international law, the jurisprudence of the ECtHR, the doctrine of domestic violence, the attributes of family relationships should be valued using their broad concept and should not be confused with the manifestations of lifestyle or specificity of domestic violence. Based on the nature of marital legal relations, the provisions of the Penal Code and international normative acts, the doctrine of domestic violence and the case law of the Constitutional Court and ECtHR, marriage should be seen as ipso jure substantiating the family relationship. In the cases concerning former close relationships, the courts follow the precedents interpreting the concept of a family member, although these criteria are not fully adequate in this case. Given the specifics of domestic violence and the fact that, even if the actual relationship is broken, certain legal family relationships still remain, and the concept of the family should apply to former spouses or partners.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.publisherVilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2018en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleŠeimos nario samprata baudžiamosiose bylose dėl smurto artimoje aplinkoje: teismų praktikos pagrįstumasen
dc.title.alternativeThe concept of a family member in criminal cases of domestic violence: the adequacy of the case lawen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.abstract-ltŠiame darbe analizuojama šeimos nario samprata, taikoma baudžiamosiose bylose dėl smurto artimoje aplinkoje nustatant kvalifikuojantį šeimos nario požymį tokiais atvejais: 1) faktinės partnerystės; 2) santuokos; 3) asmenų, praeityje sietų artimais santykiais; 4) tam tikrais kitais atvejais. Remiantis analogijos draudimo baudžiamojoje teisėje principu, darytina išvada, kad siekiant užtikrinti tinkamą nusikaltimų aukų apsaugą ir tinkamą kvalifikavimą, būtina BK XVII skyriuje „Nusikaltimai žmogaus gyvybei“ ir XVIII skyriuje „Nusikaltimai žmogaus sveikatai“ įtvirtinti šeimos nario sąvokos išaiškinimą. Taikant šeimos sampratą tokio pobūdžio bylose, būtina atsižvelgti į tarptautinių norminių aktų nuostatas, Europos žmogaus teisių teismo praktiką, smurto artimoje aplinkoje doktriną.en
dc.doi10.13165/JUR-18-25-1-10en
dc.editorial.boardYraen
dc.identifier.alephelaba:30311746en
dc.publication.sourceJurisprudencija. ISSN 1392-6195, 2018, 25(1)en
dc.subject.facultyMykolo Romerio teisės mokyklaen
dc.subject.keywordSmurtas artimoje aplinkojeen
dc.subject.keywordŠeimos narysen
dc.subject.keywordSamprataen
dc.subject.keywordDomestic violenceen
dc.subject.keywordA family memberen
dc.subject.keywordConcepten
dc.subject.publicationtypeS4en
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record