Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLenaerts, Koen
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-17T07:33:00Z
dc.date.available2017-10-17T07:33:00Z
dc.identifier.issn2351-6674
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/14748
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherVilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetasen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleEU citizenship and the European Court of Justice's ‘stone-by-stone’ approachen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.abstract-ltExamining the seminal judgment of the European Court of Justice (the ‘ECJ’) in the Ruiz Zambrano case (C‑34/09,EU:C:2011:124) and its progeny, this paper is to illustrate the fact that in hard cases of constitutional importance the ECJ follows an incremental approach. This means ,in essence, that the ECJ does not take ‘longjumps’ when expounding the rationale underpinning the solution given to novel questions of constitutional importance. On the contrary, the persuasiveness of its argumentative discourse is built up progressively, i.e., ‘stone-by-stone’.en
dc.doi10.1016/j.icj.2015.10.005en
dc.editorial.boardYraen
dc.identifier.aleph-en
dc.publication.sourceInternational comparative jurisprudence. ISSN 2351-6674, 2015, Vol. 1, No 1en
dc.subject.facultyKitasen
dc.subject.keywordEU citizenshipen
dc.subject.keywordArticle 20 TFEUen
dc.subject.keywordDirective 2004/38en
dc.subject.publicationtypeS4en
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record