Kriminalistinių versijų koncepcijų istorinės raidos bruožai.
MetadataShow full item record
attention paid for criminal versions in a Lithuanian criminal science, just a few authors, e. g. S. Kuklianskis, P. Danisevičius, E. Palskys, R. Burda, J. Rinkevičius and the author of this article, have made some researches on this particular question. The main task of this article is to make particular review of the beginning, evolution and development tendentions of criminal versions. Only from the historical point of view one can be able to make any prognosis and to plan strategy on an investigation of crime and to use any criminal versions and it's guidelines. In this article an opinion of Austrian, Lithuanian, Russian, Switzereland, Germany, Eastern Europe and USA scholars was used. After evaluation of the opinions mentioned above the author of this article, concludes a following: 1. The beginning of the researches of the conseptions of criminal versions started since the first decades of 20 century in Austria and Germany, where first scientific researches were done by famous scholars E. Anuschbat and E. Phillipe, in former Soviet UNION – by V. Gromov, S. Golunski, B. Shaver, A. Vinberg. These schollars should be considered as a foundators of the conseption of this problem. 2. In a middle of 20 century the way of theoretical criminal thinking was created in Austria, Germany, Switzerland and conseptions of criminal versions were risen in a former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. 3. In a field of European sholars criminal researches one can see following theroretical groups of the criminal versions conseption: first of it, mostly splited in Russia and Eastern Europe, could be called as „the conseption of criminal version“, and the second one which represents german nations point of view – the conseption of the way of thinking of investigation of crime. The main thing whiffing theese two differences is a an object of research – the pecularities and consistency of investigator's way of thinking in a criminal procedure. And of course different things between theese two conseptions are that this is mostly theoretical model, therefore it is hardly applicable in practice, especially in Russia. But in a Europe, where a lot of new technical possibilities are used and constantly renovated, such as profiling of criminal person, analysis of the place of crime there cant be expected that planing of criminal versions will work more productively. 4. In Lithuania an implementation of the conseption of criminal versions stays problematic, because there is no fundamental generalization of separate or different types of crime. 102
- Straipsniai / Articles