Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorButkus, Fabijonas Saulius
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-10T13:29:08Z
dc.date.available2015-02-10T13:29:08Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/2519/2326
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/13507
dc.description.abstractSome serious shortcomings of existing Lithuanian legal acts are described in the article. One of them is the absence of work description as necessary element of work contract in the Lithuanian work contract law. Determination of work functions , tasks and responsibilities only by occupational tittle opens a great possibilities for employer to change the real contract requirements. Other shortcoming is considering the trade unions as the only representative of employees in collective bargaining process. Almost total absence of collective contracts is the result of such position of the state in the conditions of very weak and unpopular postsoviet trade unions in Lithuania. Such situation is caused by not understanding the legal act as an organization’s management instrument needing clear formulation of its goal. The goal of each legal act is considered by author as concillation of interests of state as a system and its elements, or among the elements of a state. An another problem caused by unsufficient knowledges of management science is the absence of mission formulation in legal acts regulating establishment of different organizations. Formulation of each organization’s mission must be based on state’s mission, declared in the Constitution of a state. In such a situation some legal acts become a serious obstacle in developing effective management practice in business. Indispensable formulation of each legal act and organization’s mission in legal acts considering establishment of particular organization in the terms of organization product consumer’s needs at the very beginning of each organization statute, is suggested by author as an effective mean of improving management effectivenes in all the organizations: business and nonprofit , including the state itself.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleĮstatymas – valdymo įrankis specifinėje organizacijoje – valstybėjeen
dc.title.alternativeLaw – an important instrument of state – special kind of organizations managementen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.abstract-ltStraipsnyje remiantis Lietuvoje veikiančių organizacijų valdymo praktikos analize daroma išvada, kad vadybinės klaidos įstatymuose, susijusiuose su vadyba, tampa trukdžiu taikant efektyvius vadybos įrankius praktikoje. Būtina suformuluoti kiekvieno įstatymo tikslą bei apibrėžti kiekvienos organizacijos paskirtį atsižvelgiant į jos produkto vartotojų poreikius. Įstatuose tai laikoma būdu išvengti dabar pasitaikančių klaidų. Straipsnyje pateikiamos vadybiškai korektiškesnės įstatymų paskirties sampratosen
dc.identifier.aleph000005333en
dc.publication.sourceViešoji politika ir administravimas, 2002, Nr. 3en
dc.subject.facultyKitasen
dc.subject.keywordĮstatymasen
dc.subject.keywordValstybėen
dc.subject.keywordLawen
dc.subject.keywordStateen
dc.subject.publicationtypeS5en
dc.subject.sciencedirection03S - Vadybaen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record