Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorValančius, Virgilijus
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-08T08:46:31Z
dc.date.available2015-01-08T08:46:31Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/3048/2849
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/12958
dc.description.abstractThe article presents some considerations about the first experiences of application of the new Code of Civil Procedure of Lithuania (during the period from 2002, when the mentioned law came into force, to 2004). The focus of attention is the reflection of novelties of the Code of Civil Procedure in the jurisprudence of Lithuanian courts. Specific attention is paid to the explanation and application of main procedural principles and principal provisions: principle of procedural concentration, cooperation, judicial obligation to provide information, obligation of parties to take care about the progress of proceedings, prohibition to misuse the procedural guarantees. The author tries to reveal the coincidence or discrepancy of the will of legislator, legal doctrine, and judicial practice when applying the provisions of the new Code of Civil Procedure in individual civil cases. Bearing in mind the importance of one of the novelties of the Code of Civil Procedure – default judgement, a bit more attention is given to the judicial application of norms, regulating the mentioned legal institution. The author concludes, that although Lithuanian courts have not succeeded to avoid different explanation and application of the norms of the new Code of Civil Procedure of Lithuania, the first experiences of application of this legal act also reveal numerous examples of „good judicial practice“, especially made by the courts of higher instance. Specific contribution to the application of the new Code of Civil Procedure of Lithuania was made by the Supreme Court of Lithuania, for the meantime by the way of consultations, as longer period of time is necessary for the first cases to reach the cassation court. Positive phenomenon is that many examples of „good judicial practice“ may be found among the rulings of the courts of appellate instance, namely the Court of Appeals of Lithuania. It is important bearing in mind the fact, that after the introduction of limited cassation and system of leaves for the cassation appeal, only the insignificant per cent of civil cases is heard by the Supreme Court of Lithuania.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleLietuvos civilinio proceso kodeksas: pirmųjų metų patirtis.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.abstract-ltStraipsnyje autorius nagrinėja Lietuvos civilinio proceso kodekso įgyvendinimo pirmųjų (2002– 2004) metų patirtį. Daugiausia dėmesio skiriama civilinio proceso kodekso naujovių „atsispindėjimui“ nacionalinėje jurisprudencijoje. Nagrinėjama nacionalinių teismų praktikos raida aiškinant Civilinio proceso kodekso naujoves, ypač civilinio proceso teisės principus. Pateikiami aukštesniųjų Lietuvos teismų „geros praktikos“, galinčios tapti bendros teismų praktikos civilinėse bylose formavimo pagrindu, civilinių bylų pavyzdžiai. Bandoma atsakyti į keliamus klausimus dėl įstatymo leidėjo valios, doktrinos ir jurisprudencijos išraiškų įvairovės arba sutapimo, teismams aiškinant ir taikant civilinio proceso nuostatas individualiose bylose. Atskleidžiami jurisprudencijos pavyzdžiai. Šiek tiek daugiau dėmesio, įvertinus šios novacijos taikymo svarbą, skiriama sprendimo už akių teisinio reglamentavimo sampratai bei praktiniam įgyvendinimui.en
dc.identifier.aleph000002016en
dc.publication.sourceJurisprudencija, 2005, 61(69)en
dc.subject.facultyTeisės fakultetasen
dc.subject.keywordCivilinis procesas. Lietuvaen
dc.subject.keywordCivil procedureen
dc.subject.publicationtypeS5
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record