Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorČėsnienė, Ilona
dc.contributor.authorČėsna, Rytis
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-15T06:38:57Z
dc.date.available2014-10-15T06:38:57Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/2796/2600
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/12503
dc.description.abstractThis article clarifies phenomenon of stalking - course of conduct directed to specific person that involves repeated visual and physical proximity, non consensual communication or verbal, written, or implied threads or a combination thereof that would cause a reasonable person fear - is analyzed. Stalking activities acquired broad public recognition in western countries during the mid-1990 when a number of criminal cases were widely reported in the media. In the response to the apparent growth of stalking (certainly increased numbers of incidents coming to the attention of the criminal justice system) and the development of new stalking model - cyberstalking, new legislations in western countries were prepared. Because of electronic communications and internet cyberstalking occurs more frequently. Usually general legal rules cannot be applied to all cyberstalking activities and this task becomes additional issue and challenge for lawyers and politicians. Concept of stalking is difficult to explain because of very broad range of possible activities and possible stalking situations. Legal regulation of stalking activities is different among different countries. Despite the new legislations, term stalking has no legal status in Australia or USA and the types of behavior that should be encompassed by the term remains contentious. Lithuanian laws do not explain term stalking and liability for stalking activities can arise only according general laws (for example Criminal Code). Research on stalking is in its infancy. The majority of studies undertaken to date have been relatively small in scale involving unrepresentative or clinical samples to explore in depth the nature of stalking victimization, the impact on victims or the motivation of the offenders.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleAsmens persekiojimas: teisinės ir psichologinės problemos.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.abstract-ltPersekiojimu vadinamas nepageidautinas pasikartojantis vieno asmens elgesys kito asmens atžvilgiu. Per pastarąjį dešimtmetį Vakarų šalyse padidėjo visuomenės ir įvairių specialistų (teisininkų, policijos pareigūnų, psichologų, psichiatrų) susidomėjimas šiuo reiškiniu. Pažymėtina, kad teisės aktai, reglamentuojantys persekiojimą, yra gana nauji, todėl teisinis persekiojimo vertinimas bei apsisaugojimo nuo persekiojimo priemonės kiekvienoje valstybėje yra skirtingos. Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjama persekiojimo samprata, teisiniai persekiojimo vertinimo aspektai Lietuvoje ir Vakarų šalyse, pateikiama trumpa persekiotojų psichologinė charakteristiką, nagrinėjami persekiojimo teisinio užkardymo ir prevencijos klausimai, aptariamos psichologinės pagalbos nukentėjusiajam galimybės. Atsižvelgiant į tai, kad mokslinių tyrimų rezultatai rodo didėjantį persekiojimo paplitimą elektroninėje erdvėje, straipsnyje šiai problemai skiriamas išskirtinis dėmesys.en
dc.identifier.aleph000002485en
dc.publication.sourceJurisprudencija, 2006, Nr. 11(89)en
dc.subject.facultySocialinės politikos fakultetasen
dc.subject.keywordTipologijaen
dc.subject.keywordPersekiotojasen
dc.subject.keywordVictimen
dc.subject.publicationtypeS3en
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record