Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPocius, Arvydas
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-06T06:54:25Z
dc.date.available2014-10-06T06:54:25Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/2669/2473
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/12271
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses the significance of living conditions of individuals sentenced to life for murder for their criminal behaviour. Living conditions of these individuals in family and at school as well as significance of these socialization institutions for personality formation are examined in this article. Also, past events, personality stimuli and crises that possibly determined criminal behaviour of an individual – persons committed murders for which have been sentenced to life – are discussed in this work. Cronbach’s alpha was applied to assess suitability of questionnaires used for the study. The group of individuals sentenced to life for murder was compared with the control group of individuals sentenced for thefts. The x 2 criterion was used to assess reliability of differences. In the opinion of individuals sentenced to life for murders, their living and personality formation conditions were not favourable in the family. The vast majority of sentenced to life for murder think that their parents did not care of them. Sentenced to life for murders 8 times more often do not agree with the statement that their parents paid some care of them, if to compare to individuals sentenced for thefts. Sentenced to life for murders 10 times more often thought that their parents were bad in respect to them, if to compare to individuals sentenced for thefts. Parents of sentenced to life for murder regularly used alcohol and in turn their children get used to alcohol usage. This process confirms the social learning theory and alcohol intoxication influenced the commitment of the murder. A 52.3 per cent of the sentenced to life for murder experienced violence from their parents (they were beaten, other corporal punishments were used). Individuals sentenced to life for murder 4.3 times more often experienced violence, if compared to individuals sentenced for thefts.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleŠeimos ir mokyklos įtaka nuteistųjų iki gyvos galvos už nužudymus asmenų nusikalstamo elgesio formavimuisi.en
dc.typeBooken
dc.description.abstract-ltStraipsnyje analizuojama nuteistųjų iki gyvos galvos už nužudymus asmenų gyvenimo sąlygų reikšmė jų nusikalstamam elgesiui. Nagrinėjamos šių asmenų gyvenimo sąlygos šeimoje ir mokykloje, šių socializacijos institutų reikšmė asmenybės formavimuisi. Aptariami praeities įvykiai, asmenybės postūmiai, krizės, kurie galbūt lėmė individo nusikalstamą elgesį – asmenys, padarę žmogžudystes, už kurias buvo nubausti iki gyvos galvos. Tyrimui naudotų klausimynų tinkamumas buvo vertinamas taikant Cronbach alfa kriterijų. Nuteistųjų iki gyvos galvos už nužudymus asmenų grupė lyginama su kontroline nuteistųjų už vagystes asmenų grupe. Skirtumų patikimumui įvertinti taikomas x 2 kriterijus. Tyrimų duomenys apdoroti statistine programa SPSS 13.0.en
dc.identifier.aleph000003413en
dc.publication.sourceJurisprudencija, 2007, Nr. 10(100)en
dc.subject.facultyTeisės fakultetasen
dc.subject.keywordNuteistieji už nužudymus iki gyvos galvosen
dc.subject.keywordGyvenimo sąlygos šeimojeen
dc.subject.keywordSentenced to life for murderen
dc.subject.keywordFamily living conditionsen
dc.subject.publicationtypeS3en
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record