Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGumuliauskienė, Laura
dc.contributor.authorVišinskis, Vigintas
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-17T12:21:37Z
dc.date.available2013-12-17T12:21:37Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-17
dc.identifier.urihttps://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/jurisprudence/article/view/46/41
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.mruni.eu/handle/007/10885
dc.description.abstractThe Article presents a study of opportunities and problems related to the procedural actions taken by bailiffs electronically. In the opinion of the authors, the digitalisation of the enforcement procedure seeks to ensure the maximum use of electronic documents: enforcement and procedural documents should function only in the electronic format and thereby should create an effective, transparent and easily accessible information system of electronic enforcement files, which will not only increase the effectiveness of performance of bailiffs and save costs, but will also ensure the protection of the rights of claimants and debtors in enforcement proceedings through reliable and prompt service of procedural documents by electronic means, access to information about the course of the enforcement proceedings by using information technologies, and transfer of certain procedural actions taken by bailiffs into the electronic environment. Section one of the Article discusses the EU regulation in the area of unification and digitalisation of the enforcement procedure. Section two deals with the possibilities of issuing electronic enforcement orders, issuance of an enforcement order, technical measures to enable bailiffs access the information systems of the institutions issuing enforcement orders by safe electronic channels and thereby electronic enforcement orders would be transferred from the issuing institution to bailiffs electronically, without using any hard copy enforcement orders. In the opinion of the authors, considering that the majority of enforcement orders are issued by courts, it would be expedient, first of all, to take advantage of the existing information system LITEKO, making it possible to keep not only court judgments but also enforcement orders there as well as providing bailiffs with technical possibilities of access to the LITEKO system and acceptance of the electronic enforcement orders from the system. A similar principle should be followed for designing integrated information systems of bailiffs and other institutions that issue enforcement orders. Section three focuses on the main procedural documents – arrangements given by bailiffs and property attachment deeds – and on their electronic service on the participants involved in the enforcement procedure. The last section of the Article offers a study of the measures to secure the rights of participants of the enforcement procedure, namely access of the participants of the enforcement procedure to the enforcement file, possibilities for courts to obtain electronic enforcement files promptly, etc.en
dc.language.isolten
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleAntstolio procesinių veiksmų atlikimas elektroniniu būdu: galimybės ir problemos.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.description.abstract-ltStraipsnyje nagrinėjamos antstolio procesinių veiksmų atlikimo elektroniniu būdu galimybės ir problemos. Autorių nuomone, vykdymo proceso elektronizavimu siekiama užtikrinti maksimalų elektroninių dokumentų naudojimą: vykdomieji ir procesiniai dokumentai turi funkcionuoti tik elektroniniu formatu ir taip sukurti efektyvią, skaidrią ir laisvai prieinamą elektroninių vykdomųjų bylų informacinę sistemą, kuri ne tik padidins antstolių darbo efektyvumą, taupys lėšas, bet ir užtikrins išieškotojų ir skolininkų teisių bei interesų apsaugą vykdymo procese: patikimai ir operatyviai įteikiant jiems procesinius dokumentus elektroninėmis priemonėmis, sudarant galimybes naudojantis informacinėmis technologijomis susipažinti su vykdymo proceso eiga, vykdomosios bylos dokumentais, perkeliant kai kuriuos antstolio atliekamus procesinius veiksmus į elektroninę erdvę.en
dc.date.published2012
dc.identifier.aleph000012144en
dc.publication.sourceJurisprudencija, 2012, Nr. 19(2)en
dc.subject.facultyTeisės fakultetasen
dc.subject.keywordCivilinis procesasen
dc.subject.keywordVykdymo procesasen
dc.subject.keywordAntstoliaien
dc.subject.keywordCivil procedureen
dc.subject.keywordEnforcement procedureen
dc.subject.keywordBailiffsen
dc.subject.sciencedirection01S - Teisėen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record