Use this url to cite publication: https://cris.mruni.eu/cris/handle/007/15699
Options
Consent to arbitration and the legacy of the Spp V. Egypt case
Type of publication
Straipsnis Scopus duomenų bazėje / Article in Scopus database (S1b)
Title
Consent to arbitration and the legacy of the Spp V. Egypt case
Publisher (trusted)
Versita |
Date Issued
2014
Extent
p. 149-162
Is part of
Baltic journal of law & politics / Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas. Kaunas ; Warsaw : Vytautas Magnus University ; Versita, 2014, vol. 7, Nr. 1.
Field of Science
Abstract
Therefore, for the purpose of establishing whether there is consent to arbitration provided in national legislation, international tribunals reasonably take a balanced approach and use the methodological mix of rules of interpretation involving various sources: the VCLT, customary law principles governing unilateral declarations and domestic legislation. Additionally, this article provides suggestions on the possible role of the Guiding Principles applicable to unilateral declarations of states capable of creating legal obligations (Guiding principles) in interpreting domestic provisions containing an offer to arbitrate before ICSID.
Type of document
type::text::journal::journal article::research article
ISSN (of the container)
2029-0454
SCOPUS
2-s2.0-84925371684
eLABa
3305224
Coverage Spatial
Lietuva / Lithuania (LT)
Language
Anglų / English (en)
Bibliographic Details
20
Access Rights
Atviroji prieiga / Open Access
File(s)
Journal | Cite Score | SNIP | SJR | Year | Quartile |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baltic Journal of Law and Politics | 0.2 | 0.241 | 0.111 | 2014 | Q4 |